Sander & Polisher

Showing all 3 results

Makita BO4556 Finishing Sander, 200 W

Original price was: ₹10,280.00.Current price is: ₹6,800.00. (Incl. of all taxes)
Weight 1.1 kg
Brand

Makita

Model No

BO4556

Product Type

Finishing Sander

Continuous rating input

200W

Pad Size

112 x 102 mm (4-3/8″ x 4″)

Abrasive Paper Size

114 x 140 mm (4-1/2″ x 5-1/2″)

Orbits Per Minute (OPM)

14,000

Dimensions (L x W x H)

131x112x141 mm (5-1/8″x4-3/8″x5-9/16″)

Net weight

1.1 kg (2.5 lbs.)

Power supply cord

2.0 m (6.6 ft)

Makita BO6030 Random Orbit Sander, 310W

Original price was: ₹25,050.00.Current price is: ₹17,900.00. (Incl. of all taxes)
Weight 2.4 kg
Brand

Makita

Model No

BO6030

Product Type

Orbit Sander

Continuous rating input

310W

Pad Size

150 mm (6″)

Abrasive Paper Size

150 mm (6″)

Orbits Per Minute (OPM)

4,000-10,000

Overall Length

309 mm (12-1/8″)

Orbit Diameter

3.0 mm (1/8″)

Power supply cord

2.5 m (8.2 ft)

Makita PC5000C Concrete Planer, 1,400 W

Original price was: ₹56,880.00.Current price is: ₹38,900.00. (Incl. of all taxes)
Brand

Makita

Model No

PC5000C

Product Type

Concrete Planer

Continuous rating input

1,400W

Wheel Diameter

125 mm (5″)

Hole Diameter

22.23 mm (7/8″)

No Load Speed (RPM)

10,000

Dimensions (L x W x H)

437x235x195 mm (17-1/8″x9-1/4″x7-5/8″)

Net weight

4 kg (8.9 lbs.)

Power supply cord

5.0 m (16.4 ft)

Online store of household appliances and electronics

Then the question arises: where’s the content? Not there yet? That’s not so bad, there’s dummy copy to the rescue. But worse, what if the fish doesn’t fit in the can, the foot’s to big for the boot? Or to small? To short sentences, to many headings, images too large for the proposed design, or too small, or they fit in but it looks iffy for reasons.

A client that’s unhappy for a reason is a problem, a client that’s unhappy though he or her can’t quite put a finger on it is worse. Chances are there wasn’t collaboration, communication, and checkpoints, there wasn’t a process agreed upon or specified with the granularity required. It’s content strategy gone awry right from the start. If that’s what you think how bout the other way around? How can you evaluate content without design? No typography, no colors, no layout, no styles, all those things that convey the important signals that go beyond the mere textual, hierarchies of information, weight, emphasis, oblique stresses, priorities, all those subtle cues that also have visual and emotional appeal to the reader.